
An early edition dust jacket illustration. I’m not including mine as it is the 1985 reissue and the jacket illustration is a hideous black, pink and white effort which offends the eye greatly. Well, maybe I will include it, but only at the very bottom. Scroll down if you dare!
December 14, 2014. Thinking some more about Christmas-including books, this novel I read and enjoyed exactly a year ago came to mind. It’s definitely not all about Christmas, but I was most intrigued by the title character’s (and presumably the author’s) thoughts on the “paganism” of many of the socially accepted customs of the time (the 1950s), and her religious musings.
For those of you who didn’t catch this the first time around, and to jog the memories of those of you who are already very familiar with D.E. Stevenson’s novels, here it is again.
Charlotte Fairlie by D.E. Stevenson ~ 1954. Also published as Blow the Wind Southerly and The Enchanted Isle. This edition: Collins, 1985. Hardcover. ISBN: 0-00-222108-X. 320 pages.
My rating: 8.5/10
Casting about on the internet this morning, looking for other opinions, for I wanted to see if my happy reading experience was shared by fellow D.E. Stevenson fans, I was more than a little bemused by the dearth of reviews on this book. I was favourably impressed, and enjoyed it a lot; I assumed others would have as well, and said so. But perhaps I am not looking in quite the right places?
A straightforward plot and a limited cast of characters make for a smooth, fast read. The heroine is a strong-minded, quiet-spoken, wise-beyond-her-years type; I greatly admired her coping skills and judicious use of silence when confronted by difficult situations; a delicious example of letting one’s enemies defeat themselves by running about ever more madly while one remains at the calm eye of the storm saving one’s breath.
Miss Fairlie’s technique reminded me strongly of that of an enigmatic young Dutch man I once spent a summer working under; in his office there hung a small plaque stating: Silence is the only satisfactory substitute for Wisdom. Berndt was both wise and silent; he was one of the most non-committal people I’ve ever come across, but when he had to say something it was always to the point. I think I learned something there, though I seldom put it into practice, being personally of the say-too-much persuasion!
Charlotte Fairlie is a young woman who has made good. Only in her late twenties, she is already the competent headmistress of a respectable girls’ boarding school. She has no family ties but for one disinterested aunt; no romances complicate her emotions. Her one thorn is the senior mathematics teacher at her school, who feels that Miss Fairlie is the devious usurper of a position which should have been her own, and does not hesitate to stir up trouble at every opportunity.
Two of Miss Fairlie’s three hundred students are causing her particular concern. One, Donny Eastwood, stands out as being one of the least bright and most dreamily befuddled children Charlotte has ever had in attendance. Charlotte suspects that there is a hidden intelligence hiding under Donny’s dull façade, and this proves to be the case when Donny perks up greatly upon becoming friends with a new student, one Tessa MacRynne.
Tessa has been living on a secluded Scottish island and having lessons from a governess, rather an anomaly in these times, for the story is set in the early 1950s, and the teaching governess is no longer anything like the norm. Tessa’s lovely, vivacious, American mother has delivered her to the school with something of a regretful attitude; Mrs. MacRynne appears vaguely desirous of confiding something to Miss Fairlie, but in the confusion and business of start-of-term she leaves without divulging, and Charlotte tucks the idea that something is not quite right with the MacRynne household away in the back of her mind.
The Eastwoods and the MacRynnes are decidedly families with “issues”, and Charlotte becomes ever more embroiled in these two students’ personal lives, culminating in a joint visit to Tessa’s island home with Tessa, Donny, and Donny’s two younger brothers, with dramatic consequences for all.
I was surprised by how much I enjoyed this story. While it was absolutely predicable in many ways, there were serious undertones that I found most moving. Charlotte herself is an exceedingly likeable character; I found I was completely taken with her and most sympathetic to the way she rebuilt her life after her father’s rejection of her after his remarriage in her adolescent years. Her own experiences aid her in understanding the woes of her students, in particular Donny and Tessa, who themselves are bereft of a beloved parent, though Tessa has a loving father to cling to while Donny’s coldly unemotional, widowed father refuses to pander to his daughter’s desperate desire for parental affection. But Charlotte is also shaken to realize that she is not as perceptive as she should be, when one of the four children is tragically involved in what appears to be a suicide attempt while on their Scottish vacation.
I should leave off here, in order to allow those of you who haven’t yet read this book to discover its charms, and its few twists and turns, for yourself. For though there are some dark themes, it is a thoughtful and hopeful story, with a strong element of good humour throughout. And, reading it in December, I was pleased to find that it described several of Charlotte’s Christmases, spent in very different circumstances.
The first is with Charlotte’s Aunt Lydia, a self-indulgent gadabout of a woman, whose Christmas celebrations Charlotte finds vaguely distasteful.
Charlotte… found herself even more out of tunes with the festivities than usual. She had nothing in common with Aunt Lydia’s friends and it did not amuse her to see a group of middle-aged people pulling crackers and wearing paper hats and kissing coyly beneath the mistletoe. In fact she found it revolting… (S)he thought about it seriously: was there any connection between Aunt Lydia’s parties and the “Christmas Spirit?” Was it priggish to be unable to join in the “fun?” She thought of the noise and the laughter and the feasting…and then she thought of the birth of a little baby in a quiet stable… The more Charlotte thought about it the more she became convinced that the orgies of Aunt Lydia and her friends were not Christian at all, but pagan…
The author obviously has this topic on her mind throughout the story, as she comes down hard against the “paganism” of secular Christmas celebrations again during her description of Charlotte’s second Christmas. This time Charlotte has decided to retreat to the depths of the country and spend Christmas alone in contemplation; it is after the turned-tragic Scottish episode, and Charlotte has much thinking to do.
Staying at a quiet country inn. Charlotte spends the week before Christmas taking walks, visiting the church, occasionally talking to the elderly vicar – in one notable exchange detailing her objections to the use of mistletoe because of its Druidic – pagan! – associations, and convincing the vicar to eliminate it from his decorations, though she will allow him to retain the holly(!)
Of her three hundred Christmas cards – delivered to the great astonishment of the villagers who have no idea that their transient visitor is a school headmistress guaranteed a card from every one of her students’ families – only a few depict the Christmas story, and this seems to Charlotte to be indicative of the increasing loss of the “real” Christmas spirit, the religious significance of the holiday. She muses on about this for some time, and comes to the conclusion that unless one has children, that Christmas is an empty celebration.
…and then she raised her eyes and saw the little church with its lights shining through the stained-glass windows and she realized that there was one child who belonged to everybody… or at least belonged to everybody who would let Him come in. The cloud upon her spirits lifted and quite suddenly she was happy and at peace.
I felt that in these passages the author’s personal feelings and thoughts were made quite clear; she uses her character to make a point she obviously feels very strongly about, and I came away feeling that I had had a glimpse into D.E. Stevenson’s private world under the guise of acquaintanceship with her fictional creation.
Whether one agrees or not with the author’s opinions regarding the paganism of popular Christmas celebrations, it was refreshing to read such a strongly expressed argument; it added a bit of an edge to what otherwise was a mildly interesting set piece: “Christmas in the village.”
Though it does not get much mention among some of D.E. Stevenson’s more popular tales, I personally enjoyed Charlotte Fairlie greatly. A simple story competently told, with enough darkness here and there to let the bright bits really shine.
Many DES fans call that second picture “the vampire cover”….It’s a little scary.
If you read the beginning of of The Two Mrs. Abbots, recently republished by Persephone books, you can hear DES’s opinion of the author’s real presence in her/his books.
Ha! The vampire cover! Perfect! 🙂
I haven’t yet acquired The Two Mrs Abbots, but I will. Soon! Have dropped some broad hints to family, but they will probably just provide the $$$ and make me order it myself. Looking forward to it greatly.
Charlotte Fairlie (aka Blow the Wind Southerly and The Enchanted Isle) is a popular DES novel with many Dessies, due, I think, to its complexities and serious byways, to say nothing of the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth and the acquisition of the Buddhist priest. Professor Eastwood is considered one of the most abusive parents in all of DES’s work.
Two Mrs. Abbotts is another general favourite, and takes us right into the joys of coping with rationing and reluctant evacuees and keeping an eye out for suspicious characters in the neighbourhood. Resist any urge to buy an old paperback version. For reasons we cannot begin to guess, chunks of the text and subplots have been removed. We believe both the Sourcebooks and Persephone versions are complete, as well as the Collins hardback (vintage).
I really liked Charlotte Fairlie – the character herself and the structure of the novel. It reads like the author is completely in control the whole way through; it is clean and tight and moves along extremely well. But I couldn’t find very many reviews, which really surprised me. Liked it *much* better than the Buncle books; felt more like a “serious” novel.
Loved the Buddhist statue subplot, as well as the fellow headmaster subplot, and was very pleased to read the Coronation episode. Am rather surprised at how many times that has shown up in my reading this year; completely random 1950s-era books both British and American have referenced it and/or included it in the subplots..
I’ve been keeping an eye out (online, of course – Ebay & AbeBooks) for a reasonably priced vintage hardback copy of The Two Mrs Abbotts, but so far no such luck, so I am now setting my sights on the new Persephone edition. Good to know about the deficiencies of the old paperbacks. Seems to me that some of the other Ace paperbacks were also edited/cut?
I am slowly acquiring some of the DES books in vintage hardcover, and am very pleased to see the re-releases by Persephone and Sourcebooks. So many more to go, though! (And why are they reprinting the same titles??? I wonder if it has anything to do with copyright issues? Or???)
I’m already at the point of re-reading some of the DES books I first acquired a year or so ago; they are standing up marvellously well to re-reads. So very pleased to have been introduced to her world!
Oh, I think my mother had that scary cover when I was a kid! I believe she now has a less scary cover, but the vampire one is the one I remember.
I have a ratty ex-library large print edition of this but the vampire cover makes me feel much better about my copy, so thanks for that. 😉
I read this back in January and while there are elements of it that I love, I think for me it just felt like too many things packed into too short a book. I enjoyed it greatly – especially the more serious elements – but it was missing that sense of cohesion that I am always longing for in D.E.S.’s books.
There is a lot packed into this book, but I thought that DES kept it quite tight, and liked how it was so no-nonsense most of the time, rather like Charlotte herself! So far I think this one and Amberwell are my DES favourites, but I still have many to read. 🙂
So glad I could make you feel better by sharing my edition’s cover. 🙂 I went so far as to Brodart it, just because I felt I owed it to a future owner to preserve the dj, but then I took it off while reading so I wouldn’t have to see it!
Most of the large print editions I’ve seen of various DES books are nothing to get excited about, but at least they aren’t actively scary. 😉
[…] neck with Amberwell for D.E.S. favourite status is this recently-read ”serious” novel, Charlotte Fairlie (1954). A girls’ school headmistress attempts to help some of her students cope with difficult […]
I’m surprised and impressed you could seamlessly link last year’s review and comments into this year’s post.
So may I add a comment for this year (see if this works)? Charlotte’s view of Christmas seems to be an anomaly in DES books. Other characters enjoy full on feasts and parties, with mistletoe, especially chez Caroline Dering in Vittoria Cottage.
(I mean, really, what is so terrible about crackers and paper hats and sherry and friendly kisses among friends enjoying a Christmas meal together?)
I wondered how I could leave the comments with the post, and then I realized that WordPress has a handy little feature which allows you to change the date/time a post is published. For example, to allow you to pre-schedule posts for the future. So I thought, “Hmmm…I wonder what would happen if I bumped the date to now?” And it worked! Which is great, because the comments are sometimes the most interesting part of the post. 🙂 Otherwise if you just “Copy Post” all the comments are stripped.
So that’s that bit.
Okay – DES and Christmas paganism – I wonder if she was repeating her own opinions (sure felt like it – those bits were quite impassioned) or if she was making them up just for Charlotte? I see that Vittoria Cottage was published in 1949, not that long before Charlotte Fairlie. I had thought that maybe this was some sort of general authorial reaction to Christmas losing its religious aspect, but I can’t think that a mere 5 years accounts for such a change.
Or maybe in Charlotte Fairlie it is more of a condemnation of the frivolous aunt? But then Charlotte gets all critical of the vicar for the mistletoe, so that argument doesn’t really fly…
I didn’t care much for Charlotte’s aunt – but then we obviously aren’t meant to.
Note to self: Take notice of Christmas traditions in DES novels. 😉
Have also just pulled Vittoria Cottage and put it on bedside table – currently reading The Shipping News by Annie Proulx (1993 in the Century of Books – a tough one to fill) and having to take a break here and there. Started off quite bleakly, but I’m hitting the halfway point and it’s hitting its stride – think I’ll end up liking it quite a lot – wasn’t sure at first quite what I was reading!
I’ve got many copies of this book. One guess what my full name is
Hmmm… 😉 (Lovely name!)
Just finished this book. The ambiguous ending wants me to know if Charlotte truly did agree to Tessa whims. Is there a sequel?
Is there a sequel? The ending is a bit ambiguous.