Archive for February, 2024

Flambards by K.M. Peyton ~ 1967. This edition: Oxford University Press, 2007. Hardcover. 227 pages.

This will be a sketchy sort of review. This novel is so well known that anything I have to say will probably have already been said.

Much of what I do have to say here is reasonably complimentary, with caveats. I do appreciate K.M. Peyton, a prolific and popular writer who died this past December at the age of ninety-four.

Flambards is probably the most prominent of her dozens of youth/young adult novels, but it is not my own personal favourite of her works. I think I would have to say that her Ruth and Pennington arc of six novels is more compelling to me personally. And the stand-alone novel A Pattern of Roses is a bit of a quiet stunner. But more about those later this year, I think. They are all piled up waiting a re-read at some point.

Back to Flambards. Though it’s often relegated to “children’s book” categorization, it’s pretty darned “adult” in many of its themes. Think National Velvet, another “juvenile” “horse book” which really isn’t a horse book, and really isn’t a juvenile, either. The horses are important, but only in relation to the main characters. Four-legged set dressing, in a way.

Twelve-year-old Christina, an orphan since the age of five, is sent to live at her widowed and crippled uncle’s mostly-male-inhabited establishment, a troubled country estate called Flambards. Uncle Russell and his older son Mark are utterly horse-mad. The stables are spotless and up-to-date; the house is decidedly neglected. Younger son William is scorned by his father and brother for his slight stature, his intellectual abilities, and most of all for his lack of true enthusiasm for all things equine, though he’s expected to participate in the usual horse-related activities such as hunting, with devastating results.

Christina enters the house just as William is being brought home on a sheep-hurdle, leg smashed from a mishap while hunting. She forms a rather furtive friendship with William during his recuperation, though she is out of sympathy with him in one major way. Christina finds that she is also enraptured with horses and riding.

There’s a bit of a back story, revealed very early on, which frames the story. Young Christina is something of an heiress, with a fortune held in trust, and the reason she was invited to live with her Uncle Russell was so she might possibly be a suitable husband (once grown up) for her cousin (half cousin?) Mark. The money is already earmarked for sinking into the Flambards estate.

Christina is a survivor, and she further refines her get-through-it technique as the years slide by. Uncle Russell and Cousin Mark continue to bluster and bully, while William quietly crafts his exit strategy from an absolutely toxic family situation, with Christina carefully navigating the territory in between.

The novel starts out with deep drama, and the trend continues right through to the end, which is, in my opinion, a bit too unlikely and awkward feeling. It didn’t sit completely well with me, hence my personal rating of 7.5/10.

Flambards is a decently enjoyable read, but none of the characters ever won my full affection, and by the end I didn’t really care all that much about who ended up with who, or what would happen to Flambards itself.

Turn the page, close the book, set it aside. It did not occupy my thoughts in the days  after reading it, as the best books do. But nonetheless it’s a keeper, and has a permanent shelf space in the K.M. Peyton stack. I’ve read it a few times over the years, and likely will again.

Flambards was a popular success and received several high profile children’s fiction awards. It was followed by two sequels in 1969, a well-received television mini-series in the 1970s, and a fourth postscript novel in 1981.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Ex-Wife by Ursula Parrott ~ 1929. This edition: McNally Editions, 2023. Foreword by Alissa Bennett. Afterword by Marc Parrott. Softcover. 218 pages.

I wish I could recall which of my fellow readers recommended this punchy little autobiographical novel, a bestseller immediately upon its anonymous publication in 1929. Described as “scandalous” and “racy” in its time,  it no longer carries the same weight as a “forbidden topic” tell-all, but has become something much more relatable, as the dissolution of marriage has become an unremarked commonplace in our North American culture, with, according to a quick internet search, something like 40% of formalized marital unions ultimately breaking down.

Here’s the flyleaf blurb from the most recent edition of this fascinating snapshot of a certain kind of cultural and personal life in the New York of the 1920s:

It’s 1924, and Peter and Patricia have what looks to be a very modern marriage. Both drink. Both smoke. Both work, Patricia as a head copywriter at a major department store. When it comes to sex with other people, both believe in “the honesty policy.” Until they don’t. Or, at least, until Peter doesn’t—and a shell-shocked, lovesick Patricia finds herself starting out all over again, but this time around as a different kind of single woman: the ex-wife.

An instant bestseller when it was published anonymously in 1929, Ex-Wife captures the speakeasies, night clubs, and parties that defined Jazz Age New York—alongside the morning-after aspirin and calisthenics, the lunch-hour visits to the gym, the girl­talk, and the freedoms and anguish of solitude. It also casts a cool eye on the bedrooms and the doctors’ offices where, despite rising hemlines, the men still call the shots. The result is a unique view of what its author Ursula Parrott called “the era of the one-night stand.”

I wouldn’t exactly call this a “revenge novel”, though seen from Patricia’s viewpoint Peter does not come off well at all. He openly sleeps around, is endlessly and cruelly critical of Patricia’s looks or, when the effects of too much work and partying start to show, her lack of them. He quite openly has a casual antipathy to their baby and is both indifferent and, when the child dies, seemingly relieved to be stripped of the burden of fatherhood. When Patricia gets pregnant a second time, Peter turns physically abusive, at one point throwing her through a glass door. Whatever Patricia’s personal flaws might be, Peter’s seem to exponentially trump them.

Patricia makes many poor decisions in the time we get to know her, but the unforeseen awfulness of Peter as a life partner is something that takes all of us by surprise – Patricia included. It was a love match to start with and passion matched passion, but somehow something changed. Patricia indicts Peter thus: “He grew tired of me, hunted about for reasons to justify his weariness; and found them.”

After a drink-fueled one night stand with Peter’s best friend – Peter doesn’t know “who”, just that it happened, as Patricia after much mental turmoil tells him – Peter gets all dramatic about Patricia breaking his trust and destroying his faith in women. He rattles on at great length about her besmirching her freshness and cleanness and innocence. She’s absolutely dirty (in his eyes)  for basically doing once what he’s been doing with unapologetically casual abandon all along. Apparently it’s different for her. Patricia pleads her case, Peter scorns her every word. Patricia wants a reconciliation. Peter absolutely doesn’t.

The marriage falls irrevocably apart, though years will pass before a divorce happens, with Peter resurfacing now and then to repeat his cutting critiques and knock Patricia out of whatever equilibrium she has attained.

Patricia, emotionally devastated, looks about for ways to dull her pain and finds them, in casual sexual encounters with many willing partners, in her success at her job, in relishing the material rewards of her work, in dressing well, dining out and dancing and and drinking, drinking, drinking. It doesn’t seem enough, though, and ultimately it isn’t.

Does this all sound too dreary for words? Initially I thought it might be, but I very soon became absolutely enthralled by Patricia’s navigation of her unwanted situation. While staying very aware that most of her issues were, at least partly, self-imposed, I soon found myself truly liking her. Her voice is by turns sad, angry, self-loathing, and absolutely cynical, but it’s also exceedingly self-aware, and genuinely humorous, as she muses on the inexplicable realities of being an unwilling “ex-wife” and everything that goes along with that designation.

Trigger warnings: This book contains frank (but not overly explicit) depictions of abortion, rape, and physical and mental abuse. It’s pretty tame stuff in comparison to what a lot of current bestsellers casually contain, but it was outspoken for its time. I felt that Parrott pulled off the tricky task of describing these experiences without crossing the line into needless titillation.

My rating: 9.5/10. The half point is deducted because the ending felt a bit uneven to me; I wanted a different resolution, though I’m not sure what that could have looked like.

An absolutely engaging story, and the characters came to life for me, sketched out and enlarged upon by a very competent writer.

The internet is abundant with elaborations on “the life she really lived”, though you might want to read Ex-Wife yourself before you drop down that particular rabbit-hole.

The afterword by Ursula Parrott’s son Marc is a bonus of the McNally edition. In real life the baby did not die, as the fictionalized child does. That said, the real-life tale of Parrot’s mothering is not exactly admirable. Marc pragmatically relates some aspects of his mother’s life and character with carefully balanced assessment, and appears to hold no grudges.

 

 

 

Read Full Post »