Lady Molly of Scotland Yard by The Baroness Orczy ~ 1910. This edition: Facsimile of the 1912 edition, The Akadine Press, 1999. Softcover. ISBN: 1-888173-97-1. 344 pages.
My rating: Hmmm. Though doubtless a good example of period fiction and an early precursor to the detective-story genre which so abundantly flourished in the decades after Lady Molly’s publication, for actual reading experience the book was not quite as fabulous as I had hoped.
A perhaps overly generous 5/10 is all I can bring myself to award it right now, though it is the sort of thing one might well become fond of on a re-read for reasons quite unrelated to literary (or detective puzzle) merit. (Or then again, maybe not!)
We meet Lady Molly, in The Ninescore Mystery, first chapter of Lady Molly of Scotland Yard, courtesy Project Gutenberg:
Well, you know, some say she is the daughter of a duke, others that she was born in the gutter, and that the handle has been soldered on to her name in order to give her style and influence.
I could say a lot, of course, but “my lips are sealed,” as the poets say. All through her successful career at the Yard she honoured me with her friendship and confidence, but when she took me in partnership, as it were, she made me promise that I would never breathe a word of her private life, and this I swore on my Bible oath–“wish I may die,” and all the rest of it.
Yes, we always called her “my lady,” from the moment that she was put at the head of our section; and the chief called her “Lady Molly” in our presence. We of the Female Department are dreadfully snubbed by the men, though don’t tell me that women have not ten times as much intuition as the blundering and sterner sex; my firm belief is that we shouldn’t have half so many undetected crimes if some of the so-called mysteries were put to the test of feminine investigation.
Do you suppose for a moment, for instance, that the truth about that extraordinary case at Ninescore would ever have come to light if the men alone had had the handling of it? Would any man have taken so bold a risk as Lady Molly did when–But I am anticipating.
Let me go back to that memorable morning when she came into my room in a wild state of agitation.
“The chief says I may go down to Ninescore if I like, Mary,” she said in a voice all a-quiver with excitement.
“You!” I ejaculated. “What for?”
“What for–what for?” she repeated eagerly. “Mary, don’t you understand? It is the chance I have been waiting for–the chance of a lifetime? They are all desperate about the case up at the Yard; the public is furious, and columns of sarcastic letters appear in the daily press. None of our men know what to do; they are at their wits’ end, and so this morning I went to the chief–”
“Yes?” I queried eagerly, for she had suddenly ceased speaking.
“Well, never mind now how I did it–I will tell you all about it on the way, for we have just got time to catch the 11 a.m. down to Canterbury. The chief says I may go, and that I may take whom I like with me. He suggested one of the men, but somehow I feel that this is woman’s work, and I’d rather have you, Mary, than anyone. We will go over the preliminaries of the case together in the train, as I don’t suppose that you have got them at your fingers’ ends yet, and you have only just got time to put a few things together and meet me at Charing Cross booking-office in time for that 11.0 sharp.”
She was off before I could ask her any more questions, and anyhow I was too flabbergasted to say much. A murder case in the hands of the Female Department! Such a thing had been unheard of until now. But I was all excitement, too, and you may be sure I was at the station in good time.
Holmes to Lady Molly’s Watson (the comparison is inevitable and apt) is our narrator Mary, who started out as Lady Molly’s maid in the days-gone-by continually referred to with much innuendo and mysterious “But I mustn’t talk about that!”
Now Mary and Lady Molly are members of the female division of Scotland Yard’s investigative force, though Mary still seems to be fulfilling many of her old duties in regard to her mistress, as well as some new ones. Messy and boring (and possibly dangerous) investigation to be done – well, let’s send Mary! Though to be fair Lady Molly puts herself in discomfort occasionally. (Very occasionally.) Most of her detecting seems to be done Hercule Poirot/Nero Wolfe style, from the comfort of an armchair while exercising her own Great Big Brain.
My biggest beef: the class distinctions so blatantly demonstrated throughout. Lady Molly is exceedingly high handed with her inferiors (that would be just about everyone she meets, works with and “investigates”) and meek Mary obviously feels that this is just the way it should be. And Lady Molly never explains; she merely orders, and her “partners” (usually Mary, but on occasion fawning members of The Force) scuttle off, sure in their belief that Lady Molly’s womanly (and aristocratic) intuition will bring a solution to the problem of the moment.
There is also a secret reason Lady Molly took up her profession at Scotland Yard; the big reveal happens in the last chapter, with Mary at last spilling all the beans she was forbidden to display previously.
Well, this allows me to tick off 1910 in the Century of Books, and also to satisfy my curiosity as to what Lady Molly was all about; I’ve occasionally seen her referenced in discussions of Golden Age women’s detective fiction; I need wonder no more.
Tasha Brandstatter’s Review echoes my feelings.
As does Stewartry – grand review.
The Wikipedia entry discusses the plot of the first few chapters in vivid, spoiler-laden detail.
And here’s the whole thing on Project Gutenberg.
I read a number of Orczy’s Scarlet Pimpernell books when I was a young teenager and was desperately in love with Sir Peter Blakeney. Never knew she’d written about a female detective. The premise sounds so promising — what a pity it doesn’t seem to live up to it.
Oh – me too! Sir Percy Blakeney was a personal heartthrob in my younger years. The keen eyes beneath the hooded lids; the passionate yet carefully hidden love for his wayward wife… Let’s just say that Lady Molly does not inspire the same emotional response; a much different sort of fiction, really – linked short stories with almost zero opportunity for real character development or readerly empathy. This said, I am tempted to revisit The Scarlet Pimpernel, to see if the magic holds. I still have my old copy, part of a matched set with Scaramouche and The Three Musketeers. I begged my mother to buy them for me; they were on offer from her mail order book club of the time, and the promotional folder was all about “Swashbuckling Drama!!!” I think I was 11 or 12, and this appealed greatly. I remember that my first reading of Scaramouche left me a bit confused – the political bits were somewhat over my head, but The Scarlet Pimpernel absolutely hit the spot. (And Dumas wasn’t half bad, either. I went on to read Monte Cristo et al.)
Have you read any of the Old Man in the Corner stories? He also sits in a chair and thinks it all out and then reveals ALL to a naive young lady reporter. The problem with short stories like that is you can tire of the formula pretty quickly. Still, I’m keen to try Lady Molly, still, despite the warning.
There you were! Hopefully you won’t get filtered out again – I did glance through the first few pages of “spam” posts and you did appear to be the lone legitimate commenter. (But if you need a link to knock-off Coach handbags or Nike shoes, I’ve got the connections. 😉 ) Have never read the Old Man in the Corner stories; may need to check these out to see if they are any better than Lady Molly. To be fair, she (Lady M) wasn’t horribly bad, and I did stay interested enough in the various puzzles to keep reading, but the solutions were frequently rather annoying, as Lady M would produce these miraculous solutions out of her womanly intuition, and the villains would collapse to jelly and confess. And the more aristocratic villains always got off, because of course their temporary lapses were always so forgivable. (The common, vulgar villains were much less fortunate.) But she was really quite rude to her ex-maid/now “partner” Mary (in quotes because the partnership was more like mastermind/minion), and Mary just laid herself down and said “Oh yes, walk on me, please!” Grrr.
My comments are not appearing in any of your posts – am I in spam? I’ve tried a different login for this one.
Oh dear! Possibly. I will go into the spam folder & take a look – I don’t see the posts WordPress filters out. This comment came through OK, though it did ask me to approve it, which is odd – usually once an address has been okayed the first time we’re good to go from then on in.
What a shame! It sounds so promising, like Harriet I was also desperately smitten with the Scarlet pimpernel, but I’d not heard of this book. May try and read it anyway someday just to see.
It is not at all in the same genre. I’ve linked to the Gutenberg version; take a browse and see what you think. Someone suggested one read Lady Molly as if it were written tongue-in-cheek – it does indeed work better if one approaches it with a sense of humour. Taken seriously it is rather maddening. *So* snobbish!!!
I yearn to love Baroness Orczy’s other books, but nothing has ever engendered nearly the same level of love as The Scarlet Pimpernel. Even recognizing how silly is now that I am an adult, I still love it so much.
I’ve read a few of the others over the years but Sir Percy stands alone, at least in memory. Time for a re-read?
[…] Class Divisions Were Never So Distinct: Lady Molly of Scotland Yard by The Baroness Orczy, first published in […]