The Runaway by Kathleen Norris ~ 1939. This edition: Collier, 1939. Hardcover. 344 pages.
During the Very Tumultuous Month just past, there were moments of serendipitous small thrills, such as stumbling upon a collection of six Kathleen Norris novels on a local buy-and-sell Facebook group while I was supposed to be scouting for a vehicle to replace the one I destroyed in my dramatic crash.
Well, no luck on another car so far (we’re not looking very hard, as ride-sharing with the other family vehicles is working out satisfactorily at present) but I did buy the books.
Good thing my expectations were realistic, for despite the seller’s enthusiastic “Aren’t these marvelous reads!” endorsement, I am finding that they are pretty well up to par with the author’s other utterly contrived dramatic romances I’ve read to date. Meaning, formula plot, gorgeous background setting.
These are as much “California novels” as anything John Steinbeck wrote, and I love that about them, having a family California connection and many fond childhood memories of orange groves and eucalyptus trees, trips into the Sierra foothills to marvel at the giant Sequoia trees, and then back to the suburbs, with immense rose bushes in every yard and quail scurrying down quiet streets lined with modest middleclass bungalows.
A golden place still in many ways – such an astonishingly distinct natural setting! – and to me much more “California” than the smoggy metropolis of L.A. and the artificial wonders of Hollywood and such.
So, as I said, Norris does the settings well, but her plots, not so much.
This one is fairly dire, as Norris novels go. Definitely B-list. Here’s the rundown, spoilers and all.
Bee-yoo-ti-ful young woman, only (and adopted) daughter of staunchly respectable working class parents in a small rural California community, yearns for more fulfillment than her current occupation as a kindergarten teacher provides. She falls into an engagement with a clean-living, very devoted Italian-American boy, which is viewed by all concerned as a mostly good thing, seeing that he is from a well-off family, though the fact that he is absolutely Catholic and she isn’t particularly religious-minded is rather a sticking point, especially with his Mamma.
Not to worry, Italian Mamma! Here comes an entrancingly romantic ne’er-do-well, who sweeps our heroine off her feet with his tales of derring-do and fervent protestations of love. Before she knows it, she’s off in the big city and married to her impulsive swain, who turns out to be a class-A jerk.
Abandoned and pregnant, our heroine returns home to Mom and Dad, who comfort and shelter her, and also welcome with open arms the wayward son-in-law when he shows up on the doorstep some five moths later.
Emotionally fraught interlude.
Heroine, child in arms, decides that she must leave her current embarrassing situation (spouse is gambling and carousing and borrowing money from all and sundry) so she hies herself all the way off to New York City, leaving her parents hosting her husband, which they do with astonishly good grace, because they’re Really Good People, and they don’t believe in divorce, and well, you never know, the couple might just sort things out down the road…
So. New York. Heroine finds herself living in poverty, working as a lowly saleswoman in a cheap clothing store. Wee child gets deathly ill. Crisis! Off to the charity ward he goes, but oh! what luck. The talented doctor who saves the wee lad’s life turns out to be none other than the husband of the now-deceased birth mother of our heroine – though he’s not her actual father.
He (the doctor) is a sedate widower, exceedingly wealthy, kind, noble, etcetera etcetera etcetera, and he takes our heroine and child under his wing, without revealing his true interest in her as the child of the woman he was married to and loved beyond all reasonable degree, what with her abandoning him for another man and then showing up pregnant begging for an abortion which of course he refuses being sternly moral and highly religious (those are some of the etceterasย previously mentioned) but he did his best to comfort her and gave her access to his fortune which she used to ensure that her baby would have a good adoptive home after she expired when the tiny babe (our heroine) was a mere few weeks old.
Still with me?
Okay, somewhere in here the heroine finds God, and starts to pray incessantly whenever she is faced with a fresh self-created dilemma, of which she has oodles.
After a passionate interlude with yet another questionably motivated swain (the heroine does have a knack for attracting rotten men!) she decides that she must return to her abandoned husband – still sponging off her parents back in California, still squandering his sporadically earned cash on loose living – because she did take those marriage vows way back when, and well, I honestly have no idea at this point why this gal does any of the things she does.
There’s a reconciliation, rocky as all get out – yeah, spouse is still a jerk to her, though all the locals, including Mom and Dad, profess a fondness for him, can’t quite get my head around that but Kathleen Norris says it’s so there there we are – and some years go by.
Then who should turn up but our heroine’s doctor hero – her not-really-her-father legal father – and quelle surprise! – heroine finds she is actually in romantic love with him, which her jealous husband picks up on immediately. Drama ensues, ending with husband dead due to a noble act, and heroine now free to blushingly profess her love to the doctor, who is only in his early fifties, after all, to her twenty-something.
Yeah, I know. Strong ick factor going on here.
Why do I read this stuff? Too strangely, entrancingly bad to look away? That has to be it…
Happy April, fellow readers! It’s got to be uphill from here! ๐ ๐
(Who am I kidding? These sorts of books are grand fun! Though maybe not quite in the sense that the authors originally intended.)
I definitely enjoyed your review, but don’t think I would enjoy the book! But thank you.
You’re most welcome! I read this one so you wouldn’t have to! ๐ ๐ ๐
Oh my, this sounds absurd even for Norris (and repetitive – elements sound highly similar to her earlier novels). But I am left worrying about her discarded Italian-American boy. Did he get a nice ending or was he just ignored for the rest of the book?
I personally think he had a lucky escape! ๐ He gets a nice Catholic girl quite a long way into the book – and he’s also the pallbearer at the heroine’s husband’s funeral at the very end, so obviously the rift is healed somewhere in there while we’re in New York with our runaway.
Yes – extremely repetitive plot, bizarre though that may seem to those unfamiliar with the Kathleen Norris body of work. ๐
I enjoy your reviews of her books so much, but they do not inspire me to look for the books myself – particularly this one!
Ah, thank you for reading this so we don’t have to.
As to why you read these books (and Phyliis Whitney’s….go on, confess), it’s probably the same as why I — knowing they’re bad for me — buy a bag of party mix and eat it all myself. Yikes! Chemicals and sodium and mystery yellow colouring. (Actually, they just fall into my shopping cart all on their own.)
Or perhaps because you know you’re going to have fun excoriating the story and the characters and the author.
But I have a question about one thing in this series of ridiculous events…. If the Noble Doctor loved the worthless mother so much, why on earth didn’t he adopt the wee indiscretion as his own when he had the chance? In fact, he possibly was her legal father already, since the mom gave birth while married to him and under his roof. (How’s that for upping the Ick Factor?)
Ah well, there’s nothing like a heroine with a Bad Taste in Men.