The Adventures of the Black Girl in her Search for God by George Bernard Shaw ~ 1933. This edition: Capricorn Books, 1959. Contains original illustrations by John Farleigh, and detailed Afterword by the author. Paperback. 96 pages.
My rating: 10/10
My last book read of the 2014 Century of Books project, and a fitting end to a year packed full of occasionally surprising, always thought-provoking, and frequently entertaining reading. Unexpected finds such as this have me looking forward to what future surprises I will doubtless discover among the dusty old tomes of yesteryear.
This is a red-hot coal of a satirical allegorical tale. It’s as relevant today – perhaps even more so – as when it was published between the world wars, when all of the established “truths” were up for questioning.
- “Where is God?” said the black girl to the missionary who had converted her.
- “He has said ‘Seek and ye shall find me'” said the missionary.
The black girl, a fine creature, whose satin skin and shining muscles made the white missionary folk seem like ashen ghosts by contrast, was an interesting but unsatisfactory convert; for instead of taking Christianity with sweet docility exactly as it was administered to her she met it with unexpected interrogative reactions which forced her teacher to improvize doctrinal replies and invent evidence on the spur of the moment to such an extent that at last she could not conceal from herself that the life of Christ, as she narrated it, had accreted so many circumstantial details and such a body of homemade doctrine that the Evangelists would have been amazed and confounded if they had been alive to hear it all put forward on their authority. Indeed the missionary’s choice of a specially remote station, which had been at first an act of devotion, very soon became a necessity, as the appearance of a rival missionary would have led to the discovery that though some of the finest plums in the gospel pudding concocted by her had been picked out of the Bible, and the scenery and dramatis personae borrowed from it, yet the resultant religion was, in spite of this element of compilation, really a product of the missionary’s own direct inspiration. Only as a solitary pioneer missionary could she be her own Church and determine its canon without fear of being excommunicated as a heretic.
But she was perhaps rash when, having taught the black girl to read, she gave her a bible on her birthday. For when the black girl, receiving her teacher’s reply very literally, took her knobkerry and strode off into the African forest in search of God, she took the bible with her as her guidebook…
This synopsis by Albert Williams condenses the high points well:
(A) Candide-like fable about an African woman who has the audacity to question the heavenly father missionaries have taught her to worship. Armed with a decaying Bible and a Zulu fighting stick, this “interesting but unsatisfactory convert” sets off through the jungle to learn why God made a world with evil. In a deceptively genial prose style that sometimes recalls Rudyard Kipling and Lewis Carroll while it skewers the hypocrisies of European colonialism, Shaw recounts his heroine’s encounters with a procession of would-be god figures: an Old Testament deity demanding suffering and sacrifice; various prophets and preachers, from Peter and Ecclesiastes to Pavlov and Shaw himself; a Muslim who insists on male superiority because “God made Man before he made Woman” (“Second thoughts are best,” replies the girl); and Jesus, reduced from being a teacher to sitting as an artist’s model. Written in South Africa in 1932, the novella was banned in Shaw’s native Ireland and attacked by churchmen as subversive (“They are quite right from their point of view,” Shaw responded); it attacks the racist and sexist underpinnings of religious dogma and prophesies the emergence of feminism and multiracialism (in the end the girl tames and weds a Shavian Irish socialist).
Have any of you read this one?
Brilliantly subversive stuff, whether one personally agrees or disagrees with Shaw’s agnostic premise. For what it’s worth (in case any of you were worried 😉 ), Jesus himself comes off quite well, though Shaw denies his deity. I can see why this received such a scalded response by the churchmen of the time.
Farleigh’s illustrations are perfect. I want to get my hands on an early hardcover copy of this one, for its sheer physical beauty as much as for its smouldering content.
I read this when I was about fourteen. It must have been in the school library (I was at rather a progressive school). I’ve never forgotten it, though I could not have given you an account of what exactly it was about. The original illustrations made a huge impression too — happy to see one reproduced here. Great.
Oh, that must have been a progressive school. 😉 Though honestly there’s nothing indecent in Shaw’s narrative and the nudity of the protagonist is necessary to the allegory. Farleigh’s engravings are memorable. I’ve encountered his engravings as well in some vintage English gardening books I have, the journalistic Ethel Armitage gems (1930s and 40s), and his work in those is botanically and artistically awe-inspiring, in detail and in stylization.
I have this but I’ve not read yet. You’ve given it such a wonderful review I’m going to look for it.
It’s an unexpected sort of thing, and I loved every word. (On a personal level as well as that of an appreciative reader of well-done satire. Being presently of an agnostic bent myself after a traditional religious upbringing – my mother was conservative Mennonite and I attended a conservative Lutheran church all through my formative years, and I thought some things which we were expected to accept without questioning were just plain wrong. In every sense of the word. “Are you sure that’s what that means?!” I wonder what effect the Shaw book would have had on me while I was wrestling with my personal theology in my teen years?!) Do look for it, and please share your thoughts.
This definitely appears to be one to look for.
I’ve been running around the past few days, and am now catching up. I see you’ve been very busy reviewing. Lots of tempting things. (Oh, was Gerald and Elizabeth really that bad for you?? :^))
Re: Gerald and Elizabeth – Yes. 🙂 I mean, it had its moments, but it was mostly overwhelmingly, awesomely bad. The weird “melancholia” thing, the ridiculous play (a princess from Venus??? What the ???? – argh!) This said, I’ve been binging on DES over the holiday break, and I’m almost ready to re-read G & E, because even a rotten DES is rather appealing, isn’t it?
There. That’s done. Lots of copies available on abebooks, reasonably priced.
Marvelous! A rather unique little work – I think you will find it fascinating.