Well, now. Some of you will have heard about the recent crash-and-burn of one of Canada’s more prominent radio hosts, Jian Ghomeshi of CBC Radio’s popular “Q” music and pop culture program. I won’t go into any details, except to say that it is a rather grim sex scandal, and centered on Mr. Ghomeshi’s amatory preferences, which at first glance, were very “shrug it off, it’s a free world and I don’t care what he does in the bedroom” stories of CONSENSUAL rough sex.
Which turned out to include sudden punches to the head, choking to the point of unconsciousness, and lots else, which I don’t need to detail because a number of Jian Ghomeshi’s erstwhile partners have. And those partners have, to a woman, maintained that the rough stuff was NOT consensual. And, even more troubling, it now is starting to appear that Mr. Ghomeshi’s managers and co-workers at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation were aware of their star’s habits, and, when they spilled over just a bit into the workplace, advised the women-who-complained to just back away and avoid being alone with the man.
Oh boy.
Anyway, Jian Ghomeshi has been fired, and has countered with a self-defensive letter on his Facebook page and a 50 million dollar wrongful dismissal lawsuit. As woman after woman has spoken out about her bad-date experiences with Jian – I believe nine so far, most asking to remain anonymous – a police investigation has been launched. And in the court of public opinion, Jian Ghomeshi has been judged and found guilty. It’s been an exceedingly sordid week or so in public and social media circles, and who knows where it will all end up.
But it all got me thinking of this book review, from back in January 2013, when Jian Ghomeshi’s star still shone brightly, and he’d just published a highly anticipated memoir, which I eagerly read. That cover image now seems beyond ironic. Something is decidedly broken.
For the record.
Originally posted January 27, 2013:
1982 by Jian Ghomeshi ~ 2012. This edition: Viking, 2012. Hardcover. ISBN: 978-0-670-06648-3. 284 pages.
My rating: 4/10.
Sorry, Jian.
Love the radio show, and you’re a great interviewer, but as far as authoring memoirs goes, well, don’t quit the day job.
*****
Here’s the promotional material that had me all keen to read this memoir by star CBC Radio host Jian Ghomeshi.
In 1982 the Commodore 64 computer was introduced, Ronald Reagan survived being shot, the Falkland War started and ended, Michael Jackson released Thriller, Canada repatriated its Constitution, and the first compact disc was sold in Germany. And that’s not all. In 1982 I blossomed from a naive fourteen-year-old trying to fit in with the cool kids to something much more: a naive eyeliner-wearing, fifteen-year-old trying to fit in with the cool kids.
So writes Jian Ghomeshi in this, his first book, 1982. It is a memoir told across intertwined stories of the songs and musical moments that changed his life. Obsessed with David Bowie (“I wanted to be Bowie,” he recalls), the adolescent Ghomeshi embarks on a Nick Hornbyesque journey to make music the centre of his life. Acceptance meant being cool, and being cool meant being Bowie. And being Bowie meant pointy black boots, eyeliner, and hair gel. Add to that the essential all-black wardrobe and you have two very confused Iranian parents, busy themselves with gaining acceptance in Canada against the backdrop of the revolution in Iran.
It is a bittersweet, heartfelt book that recalls awkward moments such as Ghomeshi’s performance as the “Ivory” in a school production of Michael Jackson and Paul McCartney’s Ebony and Ivory; a stakeout where Rush was rehearsing for its world tour; and a memorable day at the Police picnic of 1982. Music is the jumping-off place for Ghomeshi to discuss young love, young heartache, conformity, and the nature of cool. At the same time, 1982 is an entertaining cultural history of a crazy era of glam, glitter, and gender-bending fads and fashions. And it is definitely the first rock memoir by a Persian-Canadian new waver.
All excited and looking forward to it – I’m a happy Q listener whenever I get the chance, and I too had (have!) a thing for the Thin White Duke – I requested this book for Christmas, and my family tried their best, but it was sold out at the local bookstore. So I was very happy last week to see it on the 7-day express shelf by the library door. (These are popular books available for one-week loan, no renewals. $1 a day for every day over the week, so there’s definitely an incentive to get them back asap.) My week is up on Tuesday, and I’ve made a concerted effort to push through it, but boy oh boy, it was tough going. (On the bright side, my family saved their $30.)
What’s wrong with it, you ask?
One word: Boring.
Boring, boring, boring.
And it wasn’t that Jian didn’t have an interesting teenage life. He did, in a tame sort of middle-class, upwardly mobile, successful immigrant family sort of way. In 1982, the year more or less profiled in this “creative autobiography”, Jian turned fifteen. He was in the throes of young love, was hanging out with a bunch of good friends, and was playing drums in a band – okay, it was the community band, but still… He was listening to all sorts of cool new music, had reinvented himself as a New Wave wannabe, and was having quite a time experimenting with hair dye and styling gel and eyeliner and dressing all in black. He had a loving and supportive family, abundant parental funding, and oodles of positive reinforcement from his teachers and the other adults in his life. He did stuff. He went places. He got into a few interesting situations, and made it through them in one piece. Easily enough stuff to write a memoir about.
A short memoir. A novella-length memoir. Not the almost-300 page thing that I have just gratefully slapped shut. Jian ran every single little incident of that year completely to death. And though it was interesting in bits here and there, ultimately I just couldn’t care.
Small sample of the prose to follow.
I will sacrifice a chunk of my evening and type this out, so you can read a bit and perhaps save yourself the heartbreak of discovering the banality that dwells within the covers of this book. Or, on the other hand, maybe you’ll love it, and wonder why I’m moaning on about the boringness of 1982. The book, that is. Not the year. Because, that would be, like, really tragic. If you like this kind of thing. And then didn’t read it. Because I was, like, panning it. Really badly. For some reason. Yeah.
Oh. No. It is catching. The prose style. You will see what I mean. In a minute. Uh huh.
Okay. Here’s Jian, describing his teenage Ontario home. Or sprinklers. Or middle-aged men. Or all three.
Thornhill was the quintessential suburb. I’ve never lived in any other suburb, but I imagine they all look like Thornhill, with people who act like they did in Thornhill. It was the kind of place where men watch sprinklers on their lawns. Have you ever noticed that men like to watch sprinklers? They do. Or at least, they did. But I think they probably still do.
When suburban men reach a certain age (let’s say, north of thirty-five), they like to stand at the foot of their front lawns and watch their sprinklers distributing water on them. This seems to be a biological need. It may look like a banal exercise, but men take it very seriously. You might expect that these men are involved in another activity while watching the lawn – like thinking. But I’m not so sure they are. I think they’re not thinking. Watching the lawn is like a middle-class, suburban form of meditation for men. It becomes more common as they age. Their heads are empty and they are just watching sprinklers. Sometimes men will rub their bellies while they watch their lawns. Perhaps these men are so tired from a busy week that this is their respite. Or maybe these men feel a sense of accomplishment and worth by looking at their lawns. Maybe, in the moments when their heads aren’t empty, they’re thinking, “This is MY lawn! Look what I’ve done. I’ve got myself a lawn with a working sprinkler! I don’t have to think. My belly feels good. I am feeling my belly.” Maybe that’s what suburban men are thinking…
This goes on, the sprinkler watching monologue, for three pages. It includes a list.
I have made a short list of the lawn sprinklers that were available in Thornhill in 1982:
- stationary sprinkler
- rotary sprinkler
- oscillating sprinkler
- pulsating(impulse) sprinkler
- travelling sprinkler
As you can see, there were distinct and varied types of sprinklers to be utilized in the suburbs in the early ’80s…
There are a lot of lists in this book. Many more lists than there were types of sprinklers in Thornhill in 1982. And reading the lists are about as exciting as standing at the bottom of the lawn watching the grass get wet.
Okay, I guess you’ve twigged that I’m pretty underwhelmed by Jian’s little personal saga.
To be fair, it did have a certain time-travel charm; a certain nostalgia factor for those of us who shared that time on the planet with Jian. Yes, we remember Commodore 64s, and rotary dial phones and twisty phone cords, and some of the more intelligible words from the major AC/DC songs. We remember Boy George, and, yes, definitely David Bowie. But we now know, those of us who’ve read your teen years – oops, year – opus, way too much about what went on in your head, way back during the time span of your fifteenth trip round the sun.
Maybe this book is all avante garde ironic, and I’m just not hip enough to appreciate it. Maybe I’m not in the right demographic. It does seems targetted at a younger set of readers, because most of it is all, “Gee whiz, when I was a kid we didn’t have all these iPods and digital cameras and cell phones and stuff. Here, let me tell you about the pathetic technology of 1982.”
But I can’t imagine anyone younger than, say, thirty-five or forty or thereabouts finding it remotely interesting.
Anyone else read this one? Am I completely out of touch? Is is deeply cool and ironic? Or just deeply boring?
*****
I do forgive you, Jian. Just don’t do it again.
No 1983. Please.
(I still like the radio show.)
More reviews:
How interesting this post is. The book sounds positively dreadful; the author possibly more so. Guilty of being typically American here and oblivious to what is going on north of the border, I will now hit google and rectify that situation.
Oh, I wonder what Google will reveal!? 😉 Methinks some of the furor is dying down, but last week this story was absolutely everywhere up here.
Sorry, I stopped listening to Q years ago, when I’d had enough of the stuffed shirt host. I did however listen when there was a guest host. Plenty of other fabulous CBC programs to listen to. Thanks for the review though, I probably wouldn’t have bought it. But seriously, a memoir at what, 40ish?
CBC remains my radio station of choice, and I shudder at what this whole episode will potentially do to it, in regards to public perception of its worthiness for continued support as a publically-funded broadcaster. But you’re right: “Q” is a mere blip in the great scheme of things, and there are many other CBC shows that are much more interesting and worthy of attention. And this is rather off-topic (though it is slightly book-related, as the Vinyl Café collections are much beloved, including by me) and might shock some people (sorry!) but I sort of wish Stuart MacLean would take a break or do something different – he’s potentially much more than the one-trick pony he has been typecast as. I am getting bored with the incessant replays of “Dave and Morley” every time I tune in. Enough! Pax! Stop! And with December looming, can we have a Christmas season without “Dave Cooks the Turkey”, please?
Yeah, I feel betrayed and dismayed. I feel I have been a fool to believe in the shining radio persona, the deft interviewer who brought out so much from his guests (and who handled the oboxious Billy Bob Thornton so coolly). All gone. Did he ever exist?
I think most of the initial rage was all about the betrayal people collectively felt, that this person (JG) was really someone else. I think he was (is!) both things – the intelligent and thoughtful interviewer and the man with a HUGE ego which allowed him to justify his treatment of his “dates” as acceptable in some convoluted way. Interesting how the conversation has developed this past week. A lot of us, myself included, at first shrugged it off, accepting JG’s claims that his partners were all consenting equal players in the “games”. Then the disclosures started coming, and we were overwhelmed by the information that came thick and fast. I think a lot of people felt like they were “fooled”, hence the universal bitterness of the response.
Yes, I think the deft interviewer is a genuine persona, and we shouldn’t lose sight of that. Why feel fooled for appreciating that aspect of this man’s public life? But that doesn’t excuse his actions in his private life. I honestly can’t say I am hugely surprised about the allegations of physical and sexual abuse – JG is very obviously a very driven man – clues abundant in that very revealing “memoir” – for as the previous commenter remarks, isn’t it rather evident of an overly developed sense of self-entitlement to produce a memoir at 40-something? JG presents himself in “1982” as if he really thinks he has something special to share; as if his existential angst is somehow of a superior quality to that of the common herd. It also reads as if he never really got over the bitterness of those so-often-emotionally-difficult teenage years. At the time of reading I caught echoes of anger at the “others” who refused to appreciate the Awesomeness of Jian Ghomeshi; his actions in private life, now so abundantly revealed, fit in with this mindset.
I have enjoyed listening to many of the interviews – and there were a lot over he years – but I can’t say I ever “loved” Jian Ghomeshi as a radio host (if I loved any of the past CBC hosts, it would have to be Vicki Gabereau, I adored her and she made me laugh so much) – I frequently found him trite and tiresome, especially in recent years as “Q” became an accepted stop on the celebrity publicity round – there has been an increasing amount of Interview-Lite chatter, and I found myself quite repelled by the frequency of “fluff” pieces, such as Suzanne Somers going on about her new diet book – that one sticks out as a “!?!” listening moment when I felt like I had inadvertently changed the channel to an infomercial program. But these celebrity gaffes aside, Jian Ghomeshi had his many moments of hitting it just right, and we shouldn’t lose sight of that aspect of his personality, either. He *is* smart and talented and thoughtful and keen – that’s one side of him, and it didn’t disappear when this scandal broke. He’s still that person. But now the secret side is on view, too, and the “ick factor” of the “he hits girls!” revelations and some of the sexual details shared has eclispsed the shining star stuff. Rightly so, but the “other” JG is still there.
The guy needs help. I hope he gets it. And as for his “victims” who have spoken out to date (remember, these are at this point all “he said/she said” allegations) – well – most of them apparently did the smart thing and broke off with JG immediately, as soon as he revealed his dark side. They’ve moved on in their lives for the most part, and, ironically, their very silence (till now) has perhaps contributed to JG’s continued vicious bedroom behaviour. No one called him on this in any sort of a serious way, and they should have, YEARS ago. If not the women in question, who stayed silent for exceedingly understandable reasons, including the sensible “I just want to put that bad memory behind me” motivation and the “I fell for his line and now feel like a fool and he’s a celebrity and will anyone believe me?”, then why not the others who knew about this?
I mean, seriously. Sexual harassment is a huge Red Alert part of corporate culture, and EVERYBODY knows the rules. JG allegedly stepped out of line there on occasion with his co-workers, and NOBODY (apparently) called him on it. And the man did have superiors – he was under the supervision of managers. So???
Ugly situation all round. It has triggered a lot of media chatter about rape culture and why sexual crime victims (in particular women) remain reluctant to share their stories and press charges, so that’s all to the good. Probably the only bright spot of this deeply disturbing affair.
[…] In Reference to Recent Headlines, a Post from the L&P Archives: 1982 by Jian Ghomeshi, November 5, […]