A Reading Diary: A Year of Favourite Books by Alberto Manguel ~ 2004. This edition: Knopf, 2004. Hardcover. ISBN: 0-676-97590-9. 253 pages.
My rating: After a certain amount of consideration, 7.5/10.
Now this is a book about books which I would be happy to have on the keeper shelf. It caught my eye during a library browse, and, after standing in the aisle and reading most of the entry regarding Kipling’s Kim, I decided it was worth an even deeper investigation. I was not disappointed.
Alberto Manguel is an Argentine-born writer, anthologist, editor, and translator. He spent his early years in Israel, where his father served as the Argentine ambassador, then back to Argentina, and, once his schooling was completed, working and living in England, France and Tahiti. He moved to Canada in 1982, eventually acquiring Canadian citizenship, though he continues to travel widely, and also maintains a home in rural France.
A Reading Diary is a vanity project of sorts, but a worthwhile one. It consists of the jottings kept over the course of a year as Manguel rereads some of his most treasured books.
It occurred to me that, rereading a book a month, I might complete, in a year, something between a personal diary and a commonplace book: a volume of notes, reflections, impressions of travel, sketches of friends, of events public and private, all elicited by my reading. I made a list of what the chosen books would be. It seemed important, for the sake of balance, that there should be a little of everything. (Since I’m nothing if not an eclectic reader, this wasn’t too difficult to accomplish.)
What has resulted is a book rich with references both everyday and arcane, from the note that the cat is nestled in a towel-lined box looking out at the rain, to the mention of the death of a friend and a reflection on the transience of all things dear to us, to the sombre discussion of the tragedy of the World Trade Centre destruction only a few years earlier, and the subsequent war in Iraq, to warm memories of golden childhood hours spent reading some of the same books that feature in this Diary.
The books chosen are:
- June ~ The Invention of Morel by Adolfo Bioy Casares
- July ~ The Island of Dr. Moreau by H.G. Wells
- August ~ Kim by Rudyard Kipling
- September ~ Memoirs from Beyond the Grave by François-René de Chateaubriand
- October ~ The Sign of Four by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
- November ~ Elective Affinities by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- December ~ The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame
- January ~ Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes
- February ~ The Tartar Steppe by Dino Buzzati
- March ~ The Pillow-Book by Sei Shonagon
- April ~ Surfacing by Margaret Atwood
- May ~ The Posthumous Memoirs of Brás Cubas by Joaquim Maria Machado de Assis
Having only read a few of the books on the list – The Island of Dr. Moreau, Kim, The Sign of Four, The Wind in the Willows, and Don Quixote – I wondered if I would be completely lost trying to read the chapters concerning the ones new to me, several of which I had never heard of before. As it turned out, this was not at all the case. A Reading Diary is not about the books as much as it is about the thoughts and connections they trigger. Manguel has such a broad experience and so much to say that everything he comes up with is fascinating even though one strains to fit it into the context of a book one hasn’t read.
Open this book up anywhere at random and perfectly crafted snippets of prose rise from the page. Here are some completely random samples.
Perhaps, in order for a book to attract us, it must establish between our experience and that of the fiction – between the two imaginations, ours and that on the page – a link of coincidences.
A brilliant touch: the woman who stains Kim’s skin to darken his colour “for protection” in the great Game (thereby changing his outer identity) is blind.
Contentment requires a certain lack of curiousity.
I feel uncomfortable having other people’s books at home. I want either to steal them or to return them immediately. There is something of the visitor who outstays his welcome in borrowed books. Reading them and knowing that they don’t belong to me gives me the feeling of something unfinished, half-enjoyed. This is also true of library books.
Brilliant sunshine, crisp cold. My neighbour comes over with a gift of fresh eggs and stays for twenty minutes discussing the conflict in Iraq. How strange for an Iraqi farmer half a world away, if he were to know that his fate is the subject of conversation here, in a small, almost invisible French village.
A few days after the tragedy, I heard of someone who had been trapped that morning inside a bookstore close to the World Trade Center. Since there was nothing to do but wait for the dust to settle, he kept on browsing through the books, in the midst of the sirens and the screams. Chateaubriand notes that, during the chaos of the French Revolution, a Breton poet just arrived in Paris asked to be taken on a tour of Versailles. “There are people,” Chateaubriand comments, “who, while empires collapse, visit fountains and gardens.”
My only disappointment, and the reason the book lost a few points with me, is the degree to which Alberto Manguel magnificently name-drops and occasionally pontificates on how dismally uneducated the hoi polloi is compared to him and his intellectually elite cronies. As he makes little effort to pander to those of a less broad experience, I think he might also have left out the occasional thinly veiled sneering. The book will ultimately find its own audience, though its readers may not all be quite what Manguel expects. I must admit my own feelings were bruised by a comment (which I did not bookmark and now, quickly browsing, cannot find) regarding the ignorance of those who only read in English. That would certainly be me, and how many others?
This one complaint aside, A Reading Diary is a fascinating glimpse into the mind of a deeply intellectual book lover, and a prolific and eclectic writer and reader.
Ugh! Arrogance and smugness are such unappealing traits! I did enjoy your review though, and it sounds like it does have many redeeming qualities. I had such high hope for Susan Hill’s “Howards End is on the Landing” and the self-righteousness did it in for me. How does ARD compare to HEIOTL?
I haven’t yet managed to read HEIOTL, though I definitely plan to. My one experience so far with Susan Hill has not been promising; I read her attempt-at-a-sequel to du Maurier’s “Rebecca”, “Mrs de Winter”, and was deeply underwhelmed, 😉 but HEIOTL has been recommended so frequently that I am curious as to how I might enjoy it myself.
A Reader’s Diary was quite good. Most of it would rate quite high, probably around a 9 or 9.5 out of 10. I liked the side paths Manguel goes down, and his thoughts on the actual books themselves. Everything is very brief, too, which made it easier going especially regarding the books I was not personally familiar with. His notes on those made them *more* accessible; I found myself grateful for that.
The name-dropping is usually very appropriate; he really knows the people he mentions, and it didn’t feel like he was puffing himself up. “The other day I was talking to Rohinton Mistry …” and it’s obvious that he & Rohinton are friends, and the Rohinton Mistry reference is because he was talking about Kiplings “Kim” and as Rohinton is the undoubted expert on India, they were comparing notes on Kipling’s veracity, etc etc.
But it made it obvious that Manguel travels in exalted circles. And he *was* very snooty about the vast masses who are not familiar with the literature of other countries. I felt that that sort of superiority was deeply unfair, as many of us have not had the opportunity (or time, or inclination!) to learn French so we can read Chateaubriand in the untranslated form, or Russian, or Spanish, or German … Manguel is clever with languages; he translates other author’s works. Most of us aren’t. No need to be all uppity at our ignorance.
But to be completely fair, this was a very, very tiny part of the book. The vast majority is non-judgemental. Well, except regarding politics. Manguel lets himself go in that area as well, but because I found I agreed with him on his general political views, that didn’t bother me as much. If you are a fan of the recent President Bush, this will *not* be your cup of tea!
While I like the premise of the book, the intellectual snobbery stuff would put me off it I think. As for Susan Hill, I share your view about “Mrs De Winter” – for me it was pretty poor – however I liked some of her other books, “The Mist In The Mirror”, “In The Springtime Of The Year” and “Air and Angels” have all been books I’ve enjoyed! So she’s better than “Mrs De Winter” suggests!
I haven’t quite written Susan Hill off – that one book experience (and a sequel to another author’s most famous story – impossibly difficult to hit just right) is not fair to judge her many years of writing on. I’m taking note of your recommendations for further exploration of her work. Looked for her in our regional library system, trying to get my hands on The Woman in Black, which someone else recommended, but there was nothing aside from Mrs. de Winter. Susan Hill obviously not that well known here in the rural reaches of British Columbia! Inter-library loan will doubtless prove more successful; I’m sure she’s available in the Vancouver-Coast region.
enjoyed your review – and then thought: isn’t that what we do as book bloggers, keeping reading diaries to share? one of my recent favourite books about books is Ex Libris, here’s a bit more about it: http://virtual-notes.blogspot.de/2012/11/ex-libris-or-when-books-become-chapters.html
joyful reads ~
What a good way to look at it! Thank you.
I never love Manguel’s books-about-reading *quite* as much as I think I’m going to – indeed, I’m have two which I haven’t finished. Actually, I love him, really love him, when he’s writing about reading in general – it’s when he gets on to authors or books I haven’t read that I lose interest (there is SO much about Borges in A Reader on Reading that I rather tired of it…)
Which makes me wonder whether I’d enjoy this, having only read The Wind in the Willows and The Invention of Morel. You say that it doesn’t much matter, so maybe it would be ok…
But I shall disagree with your first commenter, and say that HEiotL is abundantly wonderful! I didn’t see it as name-droppy or self-righteous, just someone who loves books and wants to share their favourites – like all of us.
I’ve just managed to get my hands on another book-about-books, In the Suicide’s Library, by Canadian poet Tim Bowling. Have you heard the buzz about this one? Saving it for a reward for as soon as I get my desk cleared of its overwhelming load of Performing Arts Festival paperwork – soon! (I then get a brief “office” hiatus before the awful tax time begins.) 🙂